Brunei vs Chile: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Brunei
0.887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Chile
0.7807 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Brunei rank
39th
Chile rank
42nd

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Brunei
  • Chile
0.50.7511.21.5199620102024

How they compare

Brunei currently reports 0.887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7807 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chile, a difference of 0.1063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Brunei's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Chile ahead.

Brunei ranks 39th and Chile ranks 42nd of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brunei averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brunei Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 0.8904 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3791 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2000s 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2010s 0.9367 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3954 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2020s 0.8475 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.844 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0035 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brunei

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Brunei or Chile?
Brunei, at 0.887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7807 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Brunei and Chile?
0.1063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Brunei ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Chile?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Brunei and Chile rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Brunei ranks 39th and Chile ranks 42nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brunei vs Chile: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brunei-darussalam/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brunei-darussalam/chile/">Brunei vs Chile: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.