Botswana vs Slovak Republic: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Botswana
0.4019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Slovak Republic
0.4047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Botswana rank
64th
Slovak Republic rank
62nd

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Botswana
  • Slovak Republic
00.250.50.7511.2199620102024

How they compare

Slovak Republic currently reports 0.4047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Botswana, a difference of 0.0028 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 64th and Slovak Republic ranks 62nd of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Slovak Republic in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Slovak Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6432 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4804 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Botswana
2000s 0.7777 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9824 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovak Republic
2010s 0.673 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1492 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovak Republic
2020s 0.4365 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6038 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1673 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovak Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Botswana or Slovak Republic?
Slovak Republic, at 0.4047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Botswana as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Botswana and Slovak Republic?
0.0028 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Slovak Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Slovak Republic?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Botswana and Slovak Republic rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Botswana ranks 64th and Slovak Republic ranks 62nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Slovak Republic: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/botswana/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/botswana/slovak-republic/">Botswana vs Slovak Republic: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.