How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Lithuania?

5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.

Where does this data come from?

UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Czechia vs Lithuania: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education

Czechia

0.677 WPIA

in 2018

Lithuania

0.6764 WPIA

in 2018

Czechia rank

27th

Lithuania rank

28th

Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education over time

Czechia
Lithuania

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 0.677 WPIA against 0.6764 WPIA in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0006 WPIA.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 27th and Lithuania ranks 28th of 46 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Czechia	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.6857 WPIA	0.6552 WPIA	0.0305 WPIA	Czechia
2010s	0.6911 WPIA	0.6947 WPIA	0.0036 WPIA	Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education, Czechia or Lithuania?: Czechia, at 0.677 WPIA against 0.6764 WPIA in Lithuania as of 2018.
What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education between Czechia and Lithuania?: 0.0006 WPIA, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Lithuania?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
How do Czechia and Lithuania rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education?: Czechia ranks 27th and Lithuania ranks 28th of 46 countries.
Where does this data come from?: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Lithuania: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-students-at-the-end-of-lower-secondary-education-achieving-at-least-a-28/czechia/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-students-at-the-end-of-lower-secondary-education-achieving-at-least-a-28/czechia/lithuania/">Czechia vs Lithuania: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)
Unit: WPIA
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 46 places, 295 data points, 2000–2018
Last refreshed: 21 August 2026

The Adjusted Wealth Parity Index (WPIA) is calculated by dividing the poorest quintile value for the indicator by the richest quintile value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted wealth parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted WPI equal to 1 indicates parity between the richest and poorest quintiles. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of the richest quintile and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of the poorest quintile. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/