Hong Kong, China vs Jordan: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Jordan
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.9118 LTPIA against 0.8985 LTPIA in Jordan, a difference of 0.0133 LTPIA.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Jordan ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 6th and Jordan ranks 9th of 47 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8692 LTPIA | 0.8991 LTPIA | 0.0299 LTPIA | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.858 LTPIA | 0.8804 LTPIA | 0.0224 LTPIA | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education, Hong Kong, China or Jordan?
- Hong Kong, China, at 0.9118 LTPIA against 0.8985 LTPIA in Jordan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education between Hong Kong, China and Jordan?
- 0.0133 LTPIA, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Jordan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Jordan rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 6th and Jordan ranks 9th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA) is calculated by dividing the value for the indicator for students who do not speak the language of the test at home by the value for the indicator for students who speak the language of the test at home. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted speaks language of the test parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LTPI equal to 1 indicates parity between students who do and do not speak the language of the test at home. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of students who speak the language of test at home. A value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of students who do not speak the language of the test at home. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/