How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Jordan?

5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.

Where does this data come from?

UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Jordan: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education

Chile

0.9031 LTPIA

in 2018

Jordan

0.8985 LTPIA

in 2018

Chile rank

7th

Jordan rank

9th

Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education over time

Chile
Jordan

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.9031 LTPIA against 0.8985 LTPIA in Jordan, a difference of 0.0046 LTPIA.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Jordan ahead.

Chile ranks 7th and Jordan ranks 9th of 47 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Jordan	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.7331 LTPIA	0.8991 LTPIA	0.166 LTPIA	Jordan
2010s	0.793 LTPIA	0.8804 LTPIA	0.0874 LTPIA	Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education, Chile or Jordan?: Chile, at 0.9031 LTPIA against 0.8985 LTPIA in Jordan as of 2018.
What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education between Chile and Jordan?: 0.0046 LTPIA, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Jordan?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
How do Chile and Jordan rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education?: Chile ranks 7th and Jordan ranks 9th of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Jordan: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-students-at-the-end-of-lower-secondary-education-achieving-at-least-a-20/chile/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-students-at-the-end-of-lower-secondary-education-achieving-at-least-a-20/chile/jordan/">Chile vs Jordan: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA)
Unit: LTPIA
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 47 places, 299 data points, 2000–2018
Last refreshed: 21 August 2026

The adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA) is calculated by dividing the value for the indicator for students who do not speak the language of the test at home by the value for the indicator for students who speak the language of the test at home. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted speaks language of the test parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LTPI equal to 1 indicates parity between students who do and do not speak the language of the test at home. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of students who speak the language of test at home. A value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of students who do not speak the language of the test at home. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/