How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Latvia?

5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.

Where does this data come from?

UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted location parity index (LPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Israel vs Latvia: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education

Israel

0.7862 LPIA

in 2018

Latvia

0.7932 LPIA

in 2018

Israel rank

22nd

Latvia rank

20th

Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education over time

Israel
Latvia

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.7932 LPIA against 0.7862 LPIA in Israel, a difference of 0.007 LPIA.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.

Israel ranks 22nd and Latvia ranks 20th of 36 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Israel	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.8691 LPIA	0.8797 LPIA	0.0106 LPIA	Latvia
2010s	0.8165 LPIA	0.8303 LPIA	0.0137 LPIA	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education, Israel or Latvia?: Latvia, at 0.7932 LPIA against 0.7862 LPIA in Israel as of 2018.
What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education between Israel and Latvia?: 0.007 LPIA, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Latvia?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
How do Israel and Latvia rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education?: Israel ranks 22nd and Latvia ranks 20th of 36 countries.
Where does this data come from?: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted location parity index (LPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Latvia: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-students-at-the-end-of-lower-secondary-education-achieving-at-least-a-19/israel/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-students-at-the-end-of-lower-secondary-education-achieving-at-least-a-19/israel/latvia/">Israel vs Latvia: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)
Unit: LPIA
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 36 places, 200 data points, 2000–2018
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

The Adjusted Location Parity Index (LPIA) is calculated by dividing the rural value for the indicator by the urban value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted location parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LPI equal to 1 indicates parity between rural and urban locations. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of urban locations and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of rural locations. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/