Mexico vs Thailand: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at over time
- Mexico
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 0.6214 LPIA against 0.4086 LPIA in Mexico, a difference of 0.2128 LPIA.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.5 times Mexico's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 32nd and Thailand ranks 29th of 39 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4455 LPIA | 0.6997 LPIA | 0.2542 LPIA | Thailand |
| 2010s | 0.5057 LPIA | 0.7446 LPIA | 0.2389 LPIA | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at, Mexico or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 0.6214 LPIA against 0.4086 LPIA in Mexico as of 2018.
- What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at between Mexico and Thailand?
- 0.2128 LPIA, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Thailand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Mexico and Thailand rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at?
- Mexico ranks 32nd and Thailand ranks 29th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Adjusted Location Parity Index (LPIA) is calculated by dividing the rural value for the indicator by the urban value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted location parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LPI equal to 1 indicates parity between rural and urban locations. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of urban locations and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of rural locations. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/