Israel vs Russian Federation: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at over time
- Israel
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 0.8333 LPIA against 0.8245 LPIA in Israel, a difference of 0.0088 LPIA.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Israel ranks 21st and Russian Federation ranks 20th of 39 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.894 LPIA | 0.8399 LPIA | 0.0541 LPIA | Israel |
| 2010s | 0.8188 LPIA | 0.8568 LPIA | 0.0379 LPIA | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at, Israel or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 0.8333 LPIA against 0.8245 LPIA in Israel as of 2018.
- What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at between Israel and Russian Federation?
- 0.0088 LPIA, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Russian Federation?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Israel and Russian Federation rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at?
- Israel ranks 21st and Russian Federation ranks 20th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Adjusted Location Parity Index (LPIA) is calculated by dividing the rural value for the indicator by the urban value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted location parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LPI equal to 1 indicates parity between rural and urban locations. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of urban locations and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of rural locations. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/