Israel vs New Zealand: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at over time
- Israel
- New Zealand
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0.8245 LPIA against 0.8236 LPIA in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0009 LPIA.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.
Israel ranks 21st and New Zealand ranks 22nd of 39 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.894 LPIA | 0.9617 LPIA | 0.0678 LPIA | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.8188 LPIA | 0.8525 LPIA | 0.0337 LPIA | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at, Israel or New Zealand?
- Israel, at 0.8245 LPIA against 0.8236 LPIA in New Zealand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at between Israel and New Zealand?
- 0.0009 LPIA, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Israel and New Zealand rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at?
- Israel ranks 21st and New Zealand ranks 22nd of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Adjusted Location Parity Index (LPIA) is calculated by dividing the rural value for the indicator by the urban value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted location parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LPI equal to 1 indicates parity between rural and urban locations. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of urban locations and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of rural locations. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/