Austria vs Latvia: Projected change in dependency ratio depending on labor force participation
Projected change in dependency ratio depending on labor force participation over time
- Austria
- Latvia
How they compare
Austria currently reports 137 against 132.78 in Latvia, a difference of 4.22.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Latvia ahead.
Austria ranks 8th and Latvia ranks 11th of 28 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 105.59 | 102.1 | 3.49 | Austria |
| 2030s | 117.57 | 104.33 | 13.24 | Austria |
| 2040s | 122.84 | 108.24 | 14.59 | Austria |
| 2050s | 130.17 | 122.12 | 8.05 | Austria |
| 2060s | 137 | 132.78 | 4.22 | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher projected change in dependency ratio depending on labor force participation, Austria or Latvia?
- Austria, at 137 against 132.78 in Latvia as of 2060.
- What is the difference in projected change in dependency ratio depending on labor force participation between Austria and Latvia?
- 4.22, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Latvia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2060.
- How do Austria and Latvia rank globally for projected change in dependency ratio depending on labor force participation?
- Austria ranks 8th and Latvia ranks 11th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Marois et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Projected change in dependency ratio depending on labor force participation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
– Age dependency is the ratio between people defined as dependents (under-15s and over-65s) and working-age people. – Labor force dependency does not take into account age brackets but instead uses the ratio between those not participating in the workforce to those that are. – High labor force participation assumes a higher share of people participating in the workforce (e.g. beyond the age of 65).