Hong Kong, China vs Slovakia: Political Stability - Governance estimate

Hong Kong, China
0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Slovakia
0.6344 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Hong Kong, China rank
62nd
Slovakia rank
61st

Political Stability - Governance estimate over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Slovakia
00.511.5199620102024

How they compare

Slovakia currently reports 0.6344 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0033 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Slovakia ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 62nd and Slovakia ranks 61st of 207 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Slovakia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7938 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovakia
2000s 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9279 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1962 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.7536 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9194 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1658 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovakia
2020s 0.3311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5904 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2593 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Hong Kong, China or Slovakia?
Slovakia, at 0.6344 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hong Kong, China as of 2024.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Hong Kong, China and Slovakia?
0.0033 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Slovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Slovakia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong, China and Slovakia rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Hong Kong, China ranks 62nd and Slovakia ranks 61st of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Slovakia: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/hong-kong-sar-china/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/hong-kong-sar-china/slovak-republic/">Hong Kong, China vs Slovakia: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,252 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.