Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Hong Kong
Hong Kong: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Political Stability - Governance estimate in Hong Kong, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, political stability - governance estimate in Hong Kong stood at 0.775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The figure is up 12.2% on the previous year and down 10.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political stability - governance estimate in Hong Kong peaked at 1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2006 and was at its lowest, -0.1805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2019.
Hong Kong ranks 61st of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Hong Kong, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.6958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.8256 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.7% |
| 2000 | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +38.3% |
| 2002 | 0.9715 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.9% |
| 2003 | 0.8085 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.8% |
| 2004 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +27.4% |
| 2005 | 1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +27.1% |
| 2006 | 1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.0% |
| 2007 | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.8% |
| 2008 | 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6% |
| 2009 | 0.9902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.5% |
| 2010 | 0.9862 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
| 2011 | 0.8891 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.8% |
| 2012 | 0.9291 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.5% |
| 2013 | 0.8392 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.7% |
| 2014 | 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.5% |
| 2015 | 0.8653 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.7% |
| 2016 | 0.6689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.7% |
| 2017 | 0.6711 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2018 | 0.7544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.4% |
| 2019 | -0.1805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -123.9% |
| 2020 | 0.0137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -107.6% |
| 2021 | 0.2217 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1513.8% |
| 2022 | 0.4018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +81.2% |
| 2023 | 0.4726 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.6% |
| 2024 | 0.6907 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +46.2% |
| 2025 | 0.775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.2% |
Hong Kong compared with similar countries
- Hong Kong's 0.775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.8176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 95% of the median. (76 countries reporting)
- Hong Kong's 0.775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.849 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 91% of the median. (36 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Hong Kong changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | +1513.8% | 0.0137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2217 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7607 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8256 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8085 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.7426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.4292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Hong Kong
More reference data data for Hong Kong
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0012 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0011 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0072 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (1990)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0072 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.004 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0056 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0052 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0347 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (1990)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political stability - governance estimate in Hong Kong?
- Political stability - governance estimate in Hong Kong was 0.775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Hong Kong?
- The highest recorded value was 1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2006.
- What is the lowest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Hong Kong?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.1805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019.
- How does Hong Kong rank for political stability - governance estimate?
- Hong Kong ranks 61st out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is political stability - governance estimate rising or falling in Hong Kong?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Hong Kong data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.