Hong Kong vs Latvia: Political Stability - Governance estimate

Hong Kong
0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Latvia
0.6201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
62nd
Latvia rank
64th

Political Stability - Governance estimate over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Latvia
00.511.5199620102024

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Latvia, a difference of 0.011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 62nd and Latvia ranks 64th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7938 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3871 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hong Kong
2000s 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7247 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3993 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hong Kong
2010s 0.7536 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6159 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hong Kong
2020s 0.3311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7545 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Hong Kong or Latvia?
Hong Kong, at 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Hong Kong and Latvia?
0.011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Latvia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong and Latvia rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Hong Kong ranks 62nd and Latvia ranks 64th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Latvia: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/hong-kong-sar-china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/hong-kong-sar-china/latvia/">Hong Kong vs Latvia: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,229 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.