India vs Sudan: Pm exposure 1990 2017, per square kilometre
India
0 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
178th
Sudan rank
177th
Pm exposure 1990 2017, per square kilometre over time
- India
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in India, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times India's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
India ranks 178th and Sudan ranks 177th of 200 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pm exposure 1990 2017, per square kilometre, India or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in India as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pm exposure 1990 2017, per square kilometre between India and Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do India and Sudan rank globally for pm exposure 1990 2017, per square kilometre?
- India ranks 178th and Sudan ranks 177th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pm exposure 1990 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pm exposure 1990 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.