Canada vs New Zealand: PISA: Male 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 5
PISA: Male 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 5 over time
- Canada
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 10.7% against 10.0% in Canada, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 4th of 52 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.3% | 13.8% | 1.6% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 10.5% | 11.2% | 0.7% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: male 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 5, Canada or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 10.7% against 10.0% in Canada as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: male 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 5 between Canada and New Zealand?
- 0.7%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Canada and New Zealand rank globally for pisa: male 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 5?
- Canada ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 4th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Male 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 5. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old male students scoring higher than 633 but less than or equal to 708 on the PISA science scale. At Level 5, students can use abstract scientific ideas or concepts to explain unfamiliar and more complex phenomena, events and processes involving multiple causal links. They are able to apply more sophisticated epistemic knowledge to evaluate alternative experimental designs and justify their choices and use theoretical knowledge to interpret information or make predictions. Level 5 students can evaluate ways of exploring a given question scientifically and identify limitations in interpretations of data sets including sources and the effects of uncertainty in scientific data. Data reflect country performance in the stated year, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/