Belgium vs Japan: PISA: Male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2
PISA: Male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2 over time
- Belgium
- Japan
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 18.4% against 17.5% in Japan, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Japan ahead.
Belgium ranks 46th and Japan ranks 49th of 53 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.1% | 16.5% | 0.4% | Japan |
| 2010s | 17.8% | 16.3% | 1.5% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2, Belgium or Japan?
- Belgium, at 18.4% against 17.5% in Japan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2 between Belgium and Japan?
- 0.9%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Japan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Belgium and Japan rank globally for pisa: male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2?
- Belgium ranks 46th and Japan ranks 49th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old male students scoring higher than 420 but lower than or equal to 482 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 2, students can interpret and recognize situations in contexts that require no more than direct inference. They can extract relevant information from a single source and make use of a single representational mode. Students at this level can employ basic algorithms, formulae, procedures, or conventions to solve problems involving whole numbers. They are capable of making literal interpretations of the results. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/