Japan vs Republic of Korea: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 5
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 5 over time
- Japan
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Japan currently reports 10.4% against 9.1% in Republic of Korea, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.2 times Republic of Korea's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 4th and Republic of Korea ranks 6th of 52 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.7% | 9.1% | 3.6% | Japan |
| 2010s | 11.4% | 8.9% | 2.4% | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: female 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 5, Japan or Republic of Korea?
- Japan, at 10.4% against 9.1% in Republic of Korea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: female 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 5 between Japan and Republic of Korea?
- 1.3%, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Republic of Korea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Japan and Republic of Korea rank globally for pisa: female 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 5?
- Japan ranks 4th and Republic of Korea ranks 6th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Female 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 5. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 633 but less than or equal to 708 on the PISA science scale. At Level 5, students can use abstract scientific ideas or concepts to explain unfamiliar and more complex phenomena, events and processes involving multiple causal links. They are able to apply more sophisticated epistemic knowledge to evaluate alternative experimental designs and justify their choices and use theoretical knowledge to interpret information or make predictions. Level 5 students can evaluate ways of exploring a given question scientifically and identify limitations in interpretations of data sets including sources and the effects of uncertainty in scientific data. Data reflect country performance in the stated year, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/