Latvia vs Russian Federation: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C over time
- Latvia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 19th and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 54 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.2% | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c, Latvia or Russian Federation?
- Latvia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Russian Federation as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c between Latvia and Russian Federation?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Russian Federation?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and Russian Federation rank globally for pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c?
- Latvia ranks 19th and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 189 but lower than or equal to 262 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 1C can understand and affirm the meaning of short, syntactically simple sentences on a literal level, and read for a clear and simple purpose within a limited amount of time. Tasks at this level involve simple vocabulary and syntactic structures. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/