Netherlands vs Türkiye: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A

Netherlands
7.0%
in 2018
Türkiye
8.0%
in 2018
Netherlands rank
21st
Türkiye rank
18th

PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A over time

  • Netherlands
  • Türkiye
24681012200320102018

How they compare

Türkiye currently reports 8.0% against 7.0% in Netherlands, a difference of 1.0%.

That makes Türkiye's figure about 1.1 times Netherlands's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Türkiye has been ahead every year.

Netherlands ranks 21st and Türkiye ranks 18th of 55 countries.

Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Türkiye Difference Ahead
2000s 4.0% 7.3% 3.3% Türkiye
2010s 5.3% 8.3% 3.0% Türkiye

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1a, Netherlands or Türkiye?
Türkiye, at 8.0% against 7.0% in Netherlands as of 2018.
What is the difference in pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1a between Netherlands and Türkiye?
1.0%, with Türkiye ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Türkiye?
6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
How do Netherlands and Türkiye rank globally for pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1a?
Netherlands ranks 21st and Türkiye ranks 18th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands vs Türkiye: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A. Statizoid, drawing on OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/pisa-female-15-year-olds-by-reading-proficiency-level-percent-level-1a/netherlands/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/pisa-female-15-year-olds-by-reading-proficiency-level-percent-level-1a/netherlands/turkiye/">Netherlands vs Türkiye: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
56 places, 356 data points, 2000–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 335 but lower than or equal to 407 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 1a can understand the literal meaning of sentences or short passages. Readers at this level can also recognize the main theme or the author’s purpose in a piece of text about a familiar topic, and make a simple connection between several adjacent pieces of information, or between the given information and their own prior knowledge. They can select a relevant page from a small set based on simple prompts, and locate one or more independent pieces of information within short texts. Level 1a readers can reflect on the overall purpose and on the relative importance of information (e.g. the main idea vs. non-essential detail) in simple texts containing explicit cues. Most tasks at this level contain explicit cues regarding what needs to be done, how to do it, and where in the text(s) readers should focus their attention. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Levels 1 to 5) than later assessments. PISA 2000/2003/2006 Level 1 data have been included in this database as Level 1A because they are based on an identical score range. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/