Iceland vs United States of America: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A

Iceland
6.0%
in 2018
United States of America
6.0%
in 2018
Iceland rank
26th
United States of America rank
26th

PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A over time

  • Iceland
  • United States of America
0246200020092018

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 6.0% against 6.0% in United States of America, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 6 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 26th and United States of America ranks 26th of 55 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland United States of America Difference Ahead
2000s 3.3% 5.0% 1.7% United States of America
2010s 5.3% 5.3% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1a, Iceland or United States of America?
Iceland, at 6.0% against 6.0% in United States of America as of 2018.
What is the difference in pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1a between Iceland and United States of America?
0.0%, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and United States of America?
6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
How do Iceland and United States of America rank globally for pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1a?
Iceland ranks 26th and United States of America ranks 26th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs United States of America: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A. Statizoid, drawing on OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/pisa-female-15-year-olds-by-reading-proficiency-level-percent-level-1a/iceland/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/pisa-female-15-year-olds-by-reading-proficiency-level-percent-level-1a/iceland/united-states/">Iceland vs United States of America: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
56 places, 356 data points, 2000–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 335 but lower than or equal to 407 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 1a can understand the literal meaning of sentences or short passages. Readers at this level can also recognize the main theme or the author’s purpose in a piece of text about a familiar topic, and make a simple connection between several adjacent pieces of information, or between the given information and their own prior knowledge. They can select a relevant page from a small set based on simple prompts, and locate one or more independent pieces of information within short texts. Level 1a readers can reflect on the overall purpose and on the relative importance of information (e.g. the main idea vs. non-essential detail) in simple texts containing explicit cues. Most tasks at this level contain explicit cues regarding what needs to be done, how to do it, and where in the text(s) readers should focus their attention. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Levels 1 to 5) than later assessments. PISA 2000/2003/2006 Level 1 data have been included in this database as Level 1A because they are based on an identical score range. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/