Republic of Korea vs Macao: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level over time
- Republic of Korea
- Macao
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 17.8% against 12.1% in Macao, a difference of 5.7%.
That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.5 times Macao's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Macao ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 50th and Macao ranks 53rd of 53 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Republic of Korea averaged higher in 1 and Macao in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.4% | 21.6% | 4.2% | Macao |
| 2010s | 17.0% | 14.6% | 2.4% | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level, Republic of Korea or Macao?
- Republic of Korea, at 17.8% against 12.1% in Macao as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level between Republic of Korea and Macao?
- 5.7%, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Macao?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Republic of Korea and Macao rank globally for pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level?
- Republic of Korea ranks 50th and Macao ranks 53rd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 420 but lower than or equal to 482 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 2, students can interpret and recognize situations in contexts that require no more than direct inference. They can extract relevant information from a single source and make use of a single representational mode. Students at this level can employ basic algorithms, formulae, procedures, or conventions to solve problems involving whole numbers. They are capable of making literal interpretations of the results. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/