Brazil vs Republic of Korea: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level over time
- Brazil
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 18.0% against 17.8% in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Brazil ranks 49th and Republic of Korea ranks 50th of 53 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.8% | 17.4% | 1.6% | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 17.7% | 17.0% | 0.6% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level, Brazil or Republic of Korea?
- Brazil, at 18.0% against 17.8% in Republic of Korea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level between Brazil and Republic of Korea?
- 0.2%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Republic of Korea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Brazil and Republic of Korea rank globally for pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level?
- Brazil ranks 49th and Republic of Korea ranks 50th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 420 but lower than or equal to 482 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 2, students can interpret and recognize situations in contexts that require no more than direct inference. They can extract relevant information from a single source and make use of a single representational mode. Students at this level can employ basic algorithms, formulae, procedures, or conventions to solve problems involving whole numbers. They are capable of making literal interpretations of the results. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/