Jordan vs Mexico: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below over time
- Jordan
- Mexico
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 28.5% against 27.7% in Mexico, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 6th and Mexico ranks 7th of 53 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.1% | 26.6% | 8.5% | Jordan |
| 2010s | 31.1% | 26.1% | 5.0% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). below, Jordan or Mexico?
- Jordan, at 28.5% against 27.7% in Mexico as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). below between Jordan and Mexico?
- 0.8%, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mexico?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Jordan and Mexico rank globally for pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). below?
- Jordan ranks 6th and Mexico ranks 7th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below Level 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old female students below the lowest proficiency level (scoring 358 or below) on the PISA mathematics scale. Students below Level 1 may be able to perform very direct and straightforward mathematical tasks, such as reading a single value from a well-labeled chart or table where the labels on the chart match the words in the stimulus and question, so that the selection criteria are clear and the relationship between the chart and the aspects of the context depicted are evident, and performing arithmetic calculations with whole numbers by following clear and well-defined instructions. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/