South Korea vs Lithuania: PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 3
PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 3 over time
- South Korea
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 28.7% against 28.6% in South Korea, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 17th and Lithuania ranks 15th of 52 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.4% | 31.1% | 1.3% | South Korea |
| 2010s | 30.5% | 29.3% | 1.2% | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 3, South Korea or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 28.7% against 28.6% in South Korea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 3 between South Korea and Lithuania?
- 0.1%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Lithuania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do South Korea and Lithuania rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 3?
- South Korea ranks 17th and Lithuania ranks 15th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 3. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 484 but less than or equal to 559 on the PISA science scale. At Level 3, students can draw upon moderately complex content knowledge to identify or construct explanations of familiar phenomena. In less familiar or more complex situations, they can construct explanations with relevant cueing or support. They can draw on elements of procedural or epistemic knowledge to carry out a simple experiment in a constrained context. Level 3 students are able to distinguish between scientific and non-scientific issues and identify the evidence supporting a scientific claim. Data reflect country performance in the stated year, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/