Jordan vs Romania: PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 3
PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 3 over time
- Jordan
- Romania
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 20.7% against 18.9% in Romania, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 40th and Romania ranks 41st of 52 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.1% | 18.1% | 0.0% | Jordan |
| 2010s | 17.3% | 19.9% | 2.7% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 3, Jordan or Romania?
- Jordan, at 20.7% against 18.9% in Romania as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 3 between Jordan and Romania?
- 1.8%, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Jordan and Romania rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 3?
- Jordan ranks 40th and Romania ranks 41st of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 3. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 484 but less than or equal to 559 on the PISA science scale. At Level 3, students can draw upon moderately complex content knowledge to identify or construct explanations of familiar phenomena. In less familiar or more complex situations, they can construct explanations with relevant cueing or support. They can draw on elements of procedural or epistemic knowledge to carry out a simple experiment in a constrained context. Level 3 students are able to distinguish between scientific and non-scientific issues and identify the evidence supporting a scientific claim. Data reflect country performance in the stated year, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/