Finland vs Hong Kong: PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 2
PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 2 over time
- Finland
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 21.7% against 21.1% in Finland, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Finland ranks 49th and Hong Kong ranks 47th of 52 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.2% | 16.3% | 1.2% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 19.0% | 18.2% | 0.8% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 2, Finland or Hong Kong?
- Hong Kong, at 21.7% against 21.1% in Finland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 2 between Finland and Hong Kong?
- 0.6%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Hong Kong?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Finland and Hong Kong rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 2?
- Finland ranks 49th and Hong Kong ranks 47th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 410 but less than or equal to 484 on the PISA science scale. At Level 2, students are able to draw on everyday content knowledge and basic procedural knowledge to identify an appropriate scientific explanation, interpret data, and identify the question being addressed in a simple experimental design. They can use basic or everyday scientific knowledge to identify a valid conclusion from a simple data set. Level 2 students demonstrate basic epistemic knowledge by being able to identify questions that can be investigated scientifically. Data reflect country performance in the stated year, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/