Indonesia vs Thailand: PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Below Level 1
PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Below Level 1 over time
- Indonesia
- Thailand
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 1.8% against 1.3% in Thailand, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.4 times Thailand's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 10th and Thailand ranks 12th of 50 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.0% | 1.5% | 1.5% | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 2.3% | 1.1% | 1.2% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). below level 1, Indonesia or Thailand?
- Indonesia, at 1.8% against 1.3% in Thailand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). below level 1 between Indonesia and Thailand?
- 0.5%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Thailand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Indonesia and Thailand rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). below level 1?
- Indonesia ranks 10th and Thailand ranks 12th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Below Level 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring below the lowest proficiency level (less than or equal to 261) on the PISA science scale. No item in the PISA assessment can indicate what students who perform below Level 1b can do. Students below Level 1b may have acquired some elements of science knowledge and skills, but based on the tasks included in the PISA test, their ability can only be described in terms of what they cannot do – and they are unlikely to be able to solve, other than by guessing, any of the PISA tasks. Data reflect country performance in the stated year, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/