Brazil vs Jordan: PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Below Level 1
PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Below Level 1 over time
- Brazil
- Jordan
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 4.0% against 3.2% in Jordan, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.3 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 2nd and Jordan ranks 4th of 50 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.5% | 4.0% | 0.5% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 3.8% | 3.8% | 0.0% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). below level 1, Brazil or Jordan?
- Brazil, at 4.0% against 3.2% in Jordan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). below level 1 between Brazil and Jordan?
- 0.8%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Jordan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Brazil and Jordan rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). below level 1?
- Brazil ranks 2nd and Jordan ranks 4th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Below Level 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring below the lowest proficiency level (less than or equal to 261) on the PISA science scale. No item in the PISA assessment can indicate what students who perform below Level 1b can do. Students below Level 1b may have acquired some elements of science knowledge and skills, but based on the tasks included in the PISA test, their ability can only be described in terms of what they cannot do – and they are unlikely to be able to solve, other than by guessing, any of the PISA tasks. Data reflect country performance in the stated year, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/