Hong Kong, China vs Russian Federation: PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C
PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 24th and Russian Federation ranks 24th of 54 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2% | 2.0% | 1.8% | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.3% | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c, Hong Kong, China or Russian Federation?
- Hong Kong, China, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Russian Federation as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c between Hong Kong, China and Russian Federation?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Russian Federation?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Russian Federation rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 24th and Russian Federation ranks 24th of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 189 but lower than or equal to 262 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 1C can understand and affirm the meaning of short, syntactically simple sentences on a literal level, and read for a clear and simple purpose within a limited amount of time. Tasks at this level involve simple vocabulary and syntactic structures. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/