Japan vs Poland: PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3 over time
- Japan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 26.5% against 26.4% in Japan, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 10th and Poland ranks 8th of 53 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.7% | 25.9% | 1.2% | Poland |
| 2010s | 25.6% | 26.4% | 0.7% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 3, Japan or Poland?
- Poland, at 26.5% against 26.4% in Japan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 3 between Japan and Poland?
- 0.1%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Japan and Poland rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 3?
- Japan ranks 10th and Poland ranks 8th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 482 but lower than or equal to 545 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 3, students can execute clearly described procedures, including those that require sequential decisions. Their interpretations are sufficiently sound to be a base for building a simple model or for selecting and applying simple problem- solving strategies. Students at this level can interpret and use representations based on different information sources and reason directly from them. They typically show some ability to handle percentages, fractions and decimal numbers, and to work with proportional relationships. Their solutions reflect that they have engaged in basic interpretation and reasoning. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/