Finland vs Iceland: PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3 over time
- Finland
- Iceland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 28.9% against 26.7% in Iceland, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 4th and Iceland ranks 7th of 53 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.3% | 26.6% | 0.7% | Finland |
| 2010s | 29.0% | 25.8% | 3.3% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 3, Finland or Iceland?
- Finland, at 28.9% against 26.7% in Iceland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 3 between Finland and Iceland?
- 2.2%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Iceland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Finland and Iceland rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 3?
- Finland ranks 4th and Iceland ranks 7th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 482 but lower than or equal to 545 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 3, students can execute clearly described procedures, including those that require sequential decisions. Their interpretations are sufficiently sound to be a base for building a simple model or for selecting and applying simple problem- solving strategies. Students at this level can interpret and use representations based on different information sources and reason directly from them. They typically show some ability to handle percentages, fractions and decimal numbers, and to work with proportional relationships. Their solutions reflect that they have engaged in basic interpretation and reasoning. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/