Serbia vs United States of America: PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2 over time
- Serbia
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 24.2% against 24.1% in Serbia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 16th and United States of America ranks 14th of 53 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.3% | 24.8% | 2.5% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 25.3% | 25.2% | 0.1% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2, Serbia or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 24.2% against 24.1% in Serbia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2 between Serbia and United States of America?
- 0.1%, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and United States of America?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Serbia and United States of America rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2?
- Serbia ranks 16th and United States of America ranks 14th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 420 but lower than or equal to 482 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 2, students can interpret and recognize situations in contexts that require no more than direct inference. They can extract relevant information from a single source and make use of a single representational mode. Students at this level can employ basic algorithms, formulae, procedures, or conventions to solve problems involving whole numbers. They are capable of making literal interpretations of the results. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/