Greece vs Uruguay: PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2

Greece
26.8%
in 2018
Uruguay
26.5%
in 2018
Greece rank
4th
Uruguay rank
5th

PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2 over time

  • Greece
  • Uruguay
0102030200320102018

How they compare

Greece currently reports 26.8% against 26.5% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.3%.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Greece has been ahead every year.

Greece ranks 4th and Uruguay ranks 5th of 53 countries.

Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 26.5% 24.5% 2.0% Greece
2010s 26.7% 24.6% 2.0% Greece

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2, Greece or Uruguay?
Greece, at 26.8% against 26.5% in Uruguay as of 2018.
What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2 between Greece and Uruguay?
0.3%, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Uruguay?
6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
How do Greece and Uruguay rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2?
Greece ranks 4th and Uruguay ranks 5th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 303 data points, 2003–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 420 but lower than or equal to 482 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 2, students can interpret and recognize situations in contexts that require no more than direct inference. They can extract relevant information from a single source and make use of a single representational mode. Students at this level can employ basic algorithms, formulae, procedures, or conventions to solve problems involving whole numbers. They are capable of making literal interpretations of the results. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/