Chile vs Latvia: PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2

Chile
25.5%
in 2018
Latvia
25.8%
in 2018
Chile rank
8th
Latvia rank
7th

PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2 over time

  • Chile
  • Latvia
0102030200320102018

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 25.8% against 25.5% in Chile, a difference of 0.3%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Latvia ahead.

Chile ranks 8th and Latvia ranks 7th of 53 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 25.6% 26.8% 1.2% Latvia
2010s 25.4% 26.9% 1.5% Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2, Chile or Latvia?
Latvia, at 25.8% against 25.5% in Chile as of 2018.
What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2 between Chile and Latvia?
0.3%, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2?
Chile ranks 8th and Latvia ranks 7th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 303 data points, 2003–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 420 but lower than or equal to 482 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 2, students can interpret and recognize situations in contexts that require no more than direct inference. They can extract relevant information from a single source and make use of a single representational mode. Students at this level can employ basic algorithms, formulae, procedures, or conventions to solve problems involving whole numbers. They are capable of making literal interpretations of the results. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/