Brazil vs Hong Kong: PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2 over time
- Brazil
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 18.2% against 13.5% in Hong Kong, a difference of 4.7%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.3 times Hong Kong's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 49th and Hong Kong ranks 52nd of 53 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.6% | 13.9% | 2.7% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 18.6% | 13.0% | 5.6% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2, Brazil or Hong Kong?
- Brazil, at 18.2% against 13.5% in Hong Kong as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2 between Brazil and Hong Kong?
- 4.7%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Hong Kong?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Brazil and Hong Kong rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 2?
- Brazil ranks 49th and Hong Kong ranks 52nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 420 but lower than or equal to 482 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 2, students can interpret and recognize situations in contexts that require no more than direct inference. They can extract relevant information from a single source and make use of a single representational mode. Students at this level can employ basic algorithms, formulae, procedures, or conventions to solve problems involving whole numbers. They are capable of making literal interpretations of the results. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/