Indonesia vs Jordan: PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 1
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 1 over time
- Indonesia
- Jordan
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 31.3% against 28.6% in Jordan, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 1st and Jordan ranks 4th of 53 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.8% | 29.6% | 2.2% | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 31.8% | 29.8% | 2.0% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 1, Indonesia or Jordan?
- Indonesia, at 31.3% against 28.6% in Jordan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 1 between Indonesia and Jordan?
- 2.7%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Jordan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Indonesia and Jordan rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 1?
- Indonesia ranks 1st and Jordan ranks 4th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 358 but lower than or equal to 420 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 1, students can answer questions involving familiar contexts where all relevant information is present and the questions are clearly defined. They are able to identify information and to carry out routine procedures according to direct instructions in explicit situations. They can perform actions that are almost always obvious and follow immediately from the given stimuli. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/