Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, adjusted
Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, adjusted over time
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has been ahead every year.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 5th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 7th of 23 groups.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, adjusted, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), at 1.0% against 1.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, adjusted between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.0%, with Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, adjusted?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 5th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 7th of 23 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/