Fiji vs Viet Nam: Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education
Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education over time
- Fiji
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 2.4% against 2.4% in Fiji, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Fiji ranks 107th and Viet Nam ranks 106th of 154 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 2 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.6% | 15.8% | 11.2% | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 6.4% | 5.5% | 0.9% | Fiji |
| 2010s | 6.2% | 2.4% | 3.7% | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education, Fiji or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 2.4% against 2.4% in Fiji as of 2012.
- What is the difference in percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education between Fiji and Viet Nam?
- 0.0%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Viet Nam?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2012.
- How do Fiji and Viet Nam rank globally for percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education?
- Fiji ranks 107th and Viet Nam ranks 106th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of pupils in each level of education (primary and lower secondary general education) who are at least 2 years above the intended age for their grade. The intended age for a given grade is the age at which pupils would enter the grade if they had started school at the official primary entrance age, had studied full-time and had progressed without repeating or skipping a grade. The value is calculated as the sum of enrolments across all grades in the given level of education which are 2 or more years older than the intended age for the given grade is expressed as a percentage of the total enrolment in the given level of education. A low value of this indicator will show that the majority of students start school on time and progress with minimum levels of grade repetition. Late school entry and significant grade repetition exacerbate over-age progression and should be discouraged as both are associated with lower levels of student learning achievement. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/