Eritrea vs IDA blend: Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education
Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education over time
- Eritrea
- IDA blend
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 41.7% against 10.4% in IDA blend, a difference of 31.3%.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 4.0 times IDA blend's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 14th and IDA blend ranks 13th of 153 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | IDA blend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.8% | 11.4% | 30.4% | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 37.9% | 11.1% | 26.8% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education, Eritrea or IDA blend?
- Eritrea, at 41.7% against 10.4% in IDA blend as of 2018.
- What is the difference in percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education between Eritrea and IDA blend?
- 31.3%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and IDA blend?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2018.
- How do Eritrea and IDA blend rank globally for percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education?
- Eritrea ranks 14th and IDA blend ranks 13th of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of pupils in each level of education (primary and lower secondary general education) who are at least 2 years above the intended age for their grade. The intended age for a given grade is the age at which pupils would enter the grade if they had started school at the official primary entrance age, had studied full-time and had progressed without repeating or skipping a grade. The value is calculated as the sum of enrolments across all grades in the given level of education which are 2 or more years older than the intended age for the given grade is expressed as a percentage of the total enrolment in the given level of education. A low value of this indicator will show that the majority of students start school on time and progress with minimum levels of grade repetition. Late school entry and significant grade repetition exacerbate over-age progression and should be discouraged as both are associated with lower levels of student learning achievement. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/