Aruba vs Niger: Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education
Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education over time
- Aruba
- Niger
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 25.8% against 23.1% in Niger, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Niger's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Niger ahead.
Aruba ranks 31st and Niger ranks 34th of 153 countries.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.1% | 29.5% | 0.4% | Niger |
| 2010s | 22.2% | 25.8% | 3.6% | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education, Aruba or Niger?
- Aruba, at 25.8% against 23.1% in Niger as of 2014.
- What is the difference in percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education between Aruba and Niger?
- 2.7%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Niger?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
- How do Aruba and Niger rank globally for percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education?
- Aruba ranks 31st and Niger ranks 34th of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of pupils in each level of education (primary and lower secondary general education) who are at least 2 years above the intended age for their grade. The intended age for a given grade is the age at which pupils would enter the grade if they had started school at the official primary entrance age, had studied full-time and had progressed without repeating or skipping a grade. The value is calculated as the sum of enrolments across all grades in the given level of education which are 2 or more years older than the intended age for the given grade is expressed as a percentage of the total enrolment in the given level of education. A low value of this indicator will show that the majority of students start school on time and progress with minimum levels of grade repetition. Late school entry and significant grade repetition exacerbate over-age progression and should be discouraged as both are associated with lower levels of student learning achievement. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/