Saint Lucia vs Zimbabwe: Per capita sources of protein
Saint Lucia
37.56
in 2023
Zimbabwe
37.81
in 2023
Saint Lucia rank
158th
Zimbabwe rank
157th
Per capita sources of protein over time
- Saint Lucia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 37.81 against 37.56 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.25.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Saint Lucia ranks 158th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 192 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20.69 | 50.01 | 29.32 | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 23.81 | 51.46 | 27.65 | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 29.99 | 44.47 | 14.48 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 32.81 | 41.16 | 8.35 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 32.84 | 39.48 | 6.63 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 37.92 | 29.85 | 8.07 | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 38.88 | 35.95 | 2.93 | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita sources of protein, Saint Lucia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 37.81 against 37.56 in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita sources of protein between Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.25, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe rank globally for per capita sources of protein?
- Saint Lucia ranks 158th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita sources of protein. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.