Hong Kong, China vs Namibia: Per capita sources of protein
Hong Kong, China
43.3
in 2023
Namibia
43.18
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
104th
Namibia rank
106th
Per capita sources of protein over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Namibia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 43.3 against 43.18 in Namibia, a difference of 0.12.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 104th and Namibia ranks 106th of 192 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 42.42 | 40.23 | 2.18 | Hong Kong, China |
| 1970s | 38.75 | 40.29 | 1.54 | Namibia |
| 1980s | 37.3 | 42.6 | 5.31 | Namibia |
| 1990s | 31.24 | 40.4 | 9.16 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 33.42 | 40.45 | 7.04 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 41.69 | 42.6 | 0.9149 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 42.1 | 42.89 | 0.7899 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita sources of protein, Hong Kong, China or Namibia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 43.3 against 43.18 in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita sources of protein between Hong Kong, China and Namibia?
- 0.12, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Namibia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Namibia rank globally for per capita sources of protein?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 104th and Namibia ranks 106th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita sources of protein. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.