Guinea-Bissau vs Hong Kong: Per capita sources of protein

Guinea-Bissau
43.2 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Hong Kong
43.3 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
105th
Hong Kong rank
104th

Per capita sources of protein over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Hong Kong
01020304050196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 43.3 grams of protein per day per capita against 43.2 grams of protein per day per capita in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.1 grams of protein per day per capita.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 105th and Hong Kong ranks 104th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and Hong Kong in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1960s 28.36 grams of protein per day per capita 42.42 grams of protein per day per capita 14.05 grams of protein per day per capita Hong Kong
1970s 30.87 grams of protein per day per capita 38.75 grams of protein per day per capita 7.88 grams of protein per day per capita Hong Kong
1980s 36.95 grams of protein per day per capita 37.3 grams of protein per day per capita 0.3496 grams of protein per day per capita Hong Kong
1990s 37.14 grams of protein per day per capita 31.24 grams of protein per day per capita 5.9 grams of protein per day per capita Guinea-Bissau
2000s 36.51 grams of protein per day per capita 33.42 grams of protein per day per capita 3.09 grams of protein per day per capita Guinea-Bissau
2010s 38.8 grams of protein per day per capita 41.69 grams of protein per day per capita 2.89 grams of protein per day per capita Hong Kong
2020s 43.36 grams of protein per day per capita 42.1 grams of protein per day per capita 1.26 grams of protein per day per capita Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita sources of protein, Guinea-Bissau or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 43.3 grams of protein per day per capita against 43.2 grams of protein per day per capita in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita sources of protein between Guinea-Bissau and Hong Kong?
0.1 grams of protein per day per capita, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Hong Kong?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Hong Kong rank globally for per capita sources of protein?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 105th and Hong Kong ranks 104th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita sources of protein. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Hong Kong: Per capita sources of protein. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-sources-of-protein/guinea-bissau/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-sources-of-protein/guinea-bissau/hong-kong-sar-china/">Guinea-Bissau vs Hong Kong: Per capita sources of protein</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita sources of protein
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.