Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Paying taxes: Time to obtain VAT refund (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology)
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
49.32
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
47.11
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
64th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
66th
Paying taxes: Time to obtain VAT refund (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 49.32 against 47.11 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 2.21.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 64th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 66th of 157 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to obtain vat refund (weeks) (db17-20 methodology), Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 49.32 against 47.11 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to obtain vat refund (weeks) (db17-20 methodology) between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 2.21, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for paying taxes: time to obtain vat refund (weeks) (db17-20 methodology)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 64th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 66th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to obtain VAT refund (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to obtain VAT refund benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.