Belgium vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Paying taxes: Time to obtain VAT refund (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology)
Belgium
51.16
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
47.11
in 2019
Belgium rank
62nd
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
66th
Paying taxes: Time to obtain VAT refund (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) over time
- Belgium
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 51.16 against 47.11 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 4.05.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 62nd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 66th of 157 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to obtain vat refund (weeks) (db17-20 methodology), Belgium or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Belgium, at 51.16 against 47.11 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to obtain vat refund (weeks) (db17-20 methodology) between Belgium and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 4.05, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Belgium and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for paying taxes: time to obtain vat refund (weeks) (db17-20 methodology)?
- Belgium ranks 62nd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 66th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to obtain VAT refund (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to obtain VAT refund benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.