Spain vs Uruguay: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

Spain
4
in 2018
Uruguay
4
in 2018
Spain rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Spain
  • Uruguay
01234180019092018

How they compare

Spain currently reports 4 against 4 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 177 shared years of data; in 1830 it was Spain ahead.

Spain ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 19 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 8 and Uruguay in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain Uruguay Difference Ahead
1830s 1.33 0 1.33 Spain
1840s 2 0 2 Spain
1850s 2 0 2 Spain
1860s 2 0 2 Spain
1870s 3.43 0 3.43 Spain
1880s 4 0 4 Spain
1890s 4 0 4 Spain
1900s 3.2 2.4 0.8 Spain
1910s 3 4 1 Uruguay
1920s 0.9 4 3.1 Uruguay
1930s 3.56 4 0.4444 Uruguay
1940s 0 4 4 Uruguay
1950s 0 4 4 Uruguay
1960s 0 4 4 Uruguay
1970s 1.6 4 2.4 Uruguay
1980s 4 4 0 β€”
1990s 4 4 0 β€”
2000s 4 4 0 β€”
2010s 4 4 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Spain or Uruguay?
Spain, at 4 against 4 in Uruguay as of 2018.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Spain and Uruguay?
0, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Uruguay?
177 years are reported by both, from 1830 to 2018.
How do Spain and Uruguay rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
Spain ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).