Peru vs Uruguay: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

Peru
4
in 2018
Uruguay
4
in 2018
Peru rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Peru
  • Uruguay
01234182119192018

How they compare

Peru currently reports 4 against 4 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 178 shared years of data; in 1830 it was Peru ahead.

Peru ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 19 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 4 and Uruguay in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Uruguay Difference Ahead
1830s 2 0 2 Peru
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 2 0 2 Peru
1890s 4 0 4 Peru
1900s 4 2.4 1.6 Peru
1910s 4 4 0 β€”
1920s 4 4 0 β€”
1930s 4 4 0 β€”
1940s 3.2 4 0.8 Uruguay
1950s 1.6 4 2.4 Uruguay
1960s 3.2 4 0.8 Uruguay
1970s 0 4 4 Uruguay
1980s 4 4 0 β€”
1990s 0.8 4 3.2 Uruguay
2000s 4 4 0 β€”
2010s 4 4 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Peru or Uruguay?
Peru, at 4 against 4 in Uruguay as of 2018.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Peru and Uruguay?
0, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Uruguay?
178 years are reported by both, from 1830 to 2018.
How do Peru and Uruguay rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
Peru ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).