Montenegro vs Uruguay: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Montenegro
4
in 2018
Uruguay
4
in 2018
Montenegro rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Montenegro
- Uruguay
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 4 against 4 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
Across all 88 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Montenegro ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 1.89 | 4 | 2.11 | Uruguay |
| 1930s | 1.5 | 4 | 2.5 | Uruguay |
| 1940s | 3.67 | 4 | 0.3333 | Uruguay |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Montenegro or Uruguay?
- Montenegro, at 4 against 4 in Uruguay as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Montenegro and Uruguay?
- 0, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Uruguay?
- 88 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
- How do Montenegro and Uruguay rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Montenegro ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).