Libya vs Thailand: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Libya
0
in 2010
Thailand
0
in 2018
Libya rank
150th
Thailand rank
150th
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Libya
- Thailand
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 against 0 in Thailand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Thailand ahead.
Libya ranks 150th and Thailand ranks 150th of 166 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2 | 3.11 | 1.11 | Thailand |
| 1960s | 1.78 | 0.4444 | 1.33 | Libya |
| 1970s | 0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | Thailand |
| 1980s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Thailand |
| 1990s | 0 | 3.6 | 3.6 | Thailand |
| 2000s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Thailand |
| 2010s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Libya or Thailand?
- Libya, at 0 against 0 in Thailand as of 2010.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Libya and Thailand?
- 0, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Thailand?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2010.
- How do Libya and Thailand rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Libya ranks 150th and Thailand ranks 150th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).