Guinea-Bissau vs Mauritius: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Guinea-Bissau
4
in 2018
Mauritius
4
in 2018
Guinea-Bissau rank
1st
Mauritius rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Mauritius
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 4 against 4 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.
Across all 43 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 4 | 2 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 3.2 | 4 | 0.8 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 3.11 | 4 | 0.8889 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Guinea-Bissau or Mauritius?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 4 against 4 in Mauritius as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2018.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).